Latest Activity

A.Mahesh left a comment for Dr. Badan Barman
5 hours ago
Dr. N K Pachauri posted a discussion
5 hours ago
A.Mahesh posted a blog post
5 hours ago
Profile IconKatie Rodgerson, Swapna Khandekar, Ajay parmar and 9 more joined LIS Links
5 hours ago
Kirtisharma updated their profile
Saturday
Dr. U. PRAMANATHAN posted blog posts
Friday
Dr. U. PRAMANATHAN posted events
Friday
Abhishek Pingale updated their profile
Friday
Noor Aziz and Dr. Badan Barman are now friends
Thursday
Profile IconAman Pathe, Dhritima Kakati, Dr. Priyanka Suryavanshi and 3 more joined LIS Links
Thursday
Devendra Singh Kotal updated their profile
Thursday
Profile IconDevendra Singh Kotal, MANI THALAPATHI, Sanjeev Kumar and 2 more joined LIS Links
Feb 3
Dr. U. PRAMANATHAN posted events
Feb 3
Dr. U. PRAMANATHAN posted blog posts
Feb 3
Dr. U. PRAMANATHAN posted a discussion
Feb 3
Dr. O Seshaiaih posted a discussion
Feb 3
Dr .K.SANGEETHA updated their profile
Feb 3
Bidyut Bikash Kalita posted a blog post
Feb 2
Dr. U. PRAMANATHAN posted a blog post
Feb 2
Dr. U. PRAMANATHAN posted a discussion
Feb 2
What do you think about the decision of UGC for negative marking in NET examination. would it be more useful to evaluate the skills and qualities of students.
Is there need of negative marking or not?

Views: 598

Reply to This

Replies to This Forum

Negative marking is really necessary to minimise "NET by Chance."

It will find out the real talents.
negative marking is good.because student will not trying our luck ,the student who work hard .then he will get succes.
negative marking system is useful for talented and hard working students, but marking pattern for different categories wise different passing pattern i want for all students that's remain same when real talent is find
I Agree with Kamlakar Dhabale
Hello Yusuf,

I personally think negative marking is a good attempt to promote the genuine canditates aspiring for NET. In my opinion negative marking won't affect the performance of candidates, because if the candidate is confident that he/she has attempted the enough questions for qualifying the paper, there is no need to attempt the questions he/she is not familiar with.

Nice question asks , Many students r more stress given for P-III, but P-I, P-II is more important b,case lot of students not passed in P-I,II so more then 60-70% students r not qualify 4 P-III so look at the results of Dec-2009 NET, The first paper is quite difficult & plus negative marking system is applied so lot of confusion ..
again UGC dec that Negive marking system is not apply for the next NET exam its good decision 4 students point of view

RSS

© 2026   Created by Dr. Badan Barman.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service

LIS Links whatsApp