LIS Links

First and Largest Academic Social Network of LIS Professionals in India

Latest Activity

komal patel updated their profile
9 hours ago
Dr. U. PRAMANATHAN posted blog posts
11 hours ago
Dr. U. PRAMANATHAN posted a discussion
13 hours ago
Dr. O Seshaiaih posted a discussion
17 hours ago
Jatin Baweja and Deepak Sharma are now friends
18 hours ago
Dr. U. PRAMANATHAN posted a blog post
Tuesday
Dr. U. PRAMANATHAN posted a discussion
Tuesday
Profile IconJasvir kaur, Dr. Nilanjana Purkayastha, Aakib and 2 more joined LIS Links
Monday
Dr. U. PRAMANATHAN posted a discussion
Monday
Hemanta Kumar Biswal posted a blog post
Monday
Dr. U. PRAMANATHAN posted blog posts
Monday
Ramesh Kumar left a comment for Saaswatee Sahoo
Saturday
Himakhi Das updated their profile
Saturday
Dr. U. PRAMANATHAN posted an event
Jun 20
Dr. U. PRAMANATHAN posted a blog post
Jun 20
Profile IconAhana Guin, Harikrishnan Sahu, Akash Baliyan and 1 more joined LIS Links
Jun 19
Saaswatee Sahoo and Ramesh Kumar are now friends
Jun 19
Ramesh Kumar might attend Dr. U. PRAMANATHAN's event
Jun 19
Dr. U. PRAMANATHAN and Naveen Dobriyal are now friends
Jun 19
Dr. U. PRAMANATHAN posted an event
Jun 19

Copyright isn't dead just because we're not willing to let it regulate us

Copyright isn't dead just because we're not willing to let it regulate us

March 24, 2012 - 4:21pm — Blake

The "copy" in copyright is there because of an accident of history: once upon a time, to "copy" was to do something industrial. Copying required physical plant, employees, premises, trading. While not everything industrial could be reduced to "copying," all copying was presumptively industrial. There were ways of non-industrially copying things – a sculptor could copy another sculptor's work by application of her eye and hand and chisel, a writer could dip his quill and set out the lines of another writer – but it wasn't really necessary to explicitly declare that this wasn't the kind of thing regulated by copyright. Such activity was almost always invisible to rights-holders, and even if an individual work happened to rise to the attention of a rights-holder, he would seem like a bit of a fool trying to apply industrial rules to individual actors. It's like asking your neighbours to register as a bed and breakfast because they've got guests in for the weekend who've chipped in for groceries.

Views: 207

Reply to This

Replies to This Forum

Article is worthy as your other articles. 

Nice job !

most of the copy right acts talk about fair use which has not been defined anywhere.

RSS

© 2025   Created by Dr. Badan Barman.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service

Koha Workshop