LIS Links

First and Largest Academic Social Network of LIS Professionals in India

Latest Activity

MOHD ASHRAF updated their profile
42 minutes ago
Dr. Manash Esh updated their profile
9 hours ago
Damodar Dashrath Waghmare updated their profile
11 hours ago
KADARI NAVEEN KUMAR updated their profile
Thursday
Dr. Rajesh Chutia updated their profile
Tuesday
Kapil Sunehria updated their profile
Monday
Kapil Sunehria and Millan Krushna Dutta are now friends
Monday
Dr. N. Kadiresan left a comment for Dr. Badan Barman
Aug 3
Chavda Jitendra Kumar Ambalal updated their profile
Aug 1
Chavda Jitendra Kumar Ambalal joined Dr. Badan Barman's group
Aug 1
Chavda Jitendra Kumar Ambalal joined Dr. Badan Barman's group
Aug 1
Jeffrey Epstein commented on Jeffrey Epstein's album
Aug 1
Jeffrey Epstein commented on Jeffrey Epstein's album
Aug 1
S RAVI posted a status
""Call for Chapter Contribution in Editorial Book…"
Jul 31
S RAVI posted a status
Jul 31
S RAVI posted a status
"Call for Chapter Contribution in Editorial Book "Introduction to Metrics Studies" https://drive.google.com/drive/home"
Jul 31
Jeffrey Epstein commented on Jeffrey Epstein's album
Jul 31
LAITHANGBAM NEPOLEAN SINGH is attending Dr. U. PRAMANATHAN's event
Jul 30
SHWETHA KV updated their profile
Jul 29
Dr. Tarvinder Singh Handa updated their profile
Jul 29

Very poor result in LIS this time. Roll Nos. of successful candidates.

UGC result, this time, is like a nightmare for all LIS professionals aspiring to clear this test. Following is the list of Roll Nos. of candidates who cracked it:

17590212: Jamia Milia Islamia, New-Delhii

31590016: University of Kashmir, Srinagar

35590003: M.S. University of Baroda, Vadodra

37590063: Madurai Kamaraj University, Madurai

50590066: University of Pune, Pune

50590186: University of Pune, Pune

First of all, Congratulations to the only six candidates who cleared this test.

Secondly it is an alarming situation for LIS professionals. Does our government require only six LIS candidates for the new session. If the other candidates fell short of the required passing criteria why didn't UGC relax the passing marks. This is a serious issue to be discussed. Please contribute your views.

Views: 140

Reply to This

Replies to This Forum

Good Morning sir,

 I agree with ur opinion, last month Asian age news paper published one news for NET exam result, the news quotes that the % of results should incresed this NET upto 12% thats why the result is declared too late, but when the result dec. just shocking .......... No words to comment sir, so all the best 4 June 2011 exam,

I think relaxing the passing marks is not a solution.......there should be more transparency in overall system.....everyone should get his report card specifying the pass marks, candidates marks in every subject......then only the candidates can improve themselves.

Dear Sandhu Ji,

I am totally agreed with your opinion. Transparency must be there. I also improve my net preparation after got my marks in  last time.

RSS

© 2025   Created by Dr. Badan Barman.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service

Koha Workshop