LIS Links

First and Largest Academic Social Network of LIS Professionals in India

Latest Activity

Sebastine Robert updated their profile
yesterday
MAYUR JAIN left a comment for Dev prajapati
yesterday
Kallol Das Talukdar and Dr. Badan Barman are now friends
Tuesday
Shivaganga salotagi updated their profile
Saturday
Ankit Jaiswal updated their profile
Aug 26
S RAVI posted a status
Aug 24
S RAVI posted a status
""Call for Chapter Contribution in Editorial Book "…"
Aug 24
M Vineesh Kumar joined Dr. Badan Barman's group
Aug 15
Dr. REKHRAJ SAHU updated their profile
Aug 15
Manju Meerwal updated their profile
Aug 13
dibyajyoti patgiri and BITUPON DOLEY are now friends
Aug 11
preeti verma updated their profile
Aug 11
preeti verma is now friends with Mohit Garg and Pramod S. Kerkar
Aug 11
KAJAL KUMARI RAO shared a profile on Facebook
Aug 10
MOHD ASHRAF updated their profile
Aug 10
Dr. Manash Esh updated their profile
Aug 8
Damodar Dashrath Waghmare updated their profile
Aug 8
KADARI NAVEEN KUMAR updated their profile
Aug 7
Dr. Rajesh Chutia updated their profile
Aug 5
Kapil Sunehria updated their profile
Aug 4

How many people had applied for the post code 69/10 and not eligible for post code 2/13 due to over age (30 + now)?

They are not taking the exam for the post code 69/10 even they have clearly mention in their advertisement 1/13  that the exam of  this post also be conduct with the post code 2/13 but now they are denying the exam that this exam will be conduct after 2/13 but how it can be possible that only 15 posts against post code 69/10  will conduct after this they will simply say that post code 69/10 is going for cancellation.

If some one agree with my views kindly do the needful as soon as possible.

Views: 1145

Reply to This

Replies to This Forum

3000 people have rejected .....but not genuine region mention here . How can do they do this ....

We should come together against dsssb before 20.9.13 my no is 9210337896

(vi) Reference was also made to orders dated 21st January, 2011 passed by the Directorate of Education, Government of NCT of Delhi as per which the post of librarian has been declared as teaching post for all purposes making librarians entitled to avail all the benefits applicable to the teaching category in prospective manner.

WP(C) No.7130/2011 & 7939/2011 Page 7 of 32

ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE

RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, J.

MAY 18, 2012/pk

WP(C) No.7130/2011 & 7939/2011 Page 32 of 32

Attachments:

Yes we should come together against dsssb. my no. is 9416815261.my post code no.is 69/10

but kaise?

Today I made a complain in public grivience office ito m bloack if any one from same condition I mean rejected for 2/13 but eligible for 69/10 he/she can make a complaint against dsssb in objection box in dsssb as well as public grivience office before 20.9.13 so that their

what a procedure of complain 

i am also with u. my mob. no. is 8506055229

simply make a complain on A4 sheets on the name Public grivence officer , m-block , ito , delhi and  make a simple draft that you are eligible for 69/10 and they are not conducting any exam for this post whereas they clearly mention in the notification that the exam for the said post shall also be conduct alongwith post code 2/13 

Yes,

I agree with this, for PGT age limit is 42 years for women , so why not for the librarians and not ready to take exam for 69/10.

 

i have a candidate has same problem. if you have also same problem then you all can meet together and go to court for relief to consider your application in coming future exams

regards

sudhir verma

9136897947

RSS

© 2025   Created by Dr. Badan Barman.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service

Koha Workshop