LIS Links

First and Largest Academic Social Network of LIS Professionals in India

Latest Activity

Dr. U. PRAMANATHAN posted an event
4 hours ago
Dr. U. PRAMANATHAN posted a blog post
4 hours ago
Profile IconAhana Guin, Harikrishnan Sahu, Akash Baliyan and 1 more joined LIS Links
9 hours ago
Saaswatee Sahoo and Ramesh Kumar are now friends
22 hours ago
Ramesh Kumar might attend Dr. U. PRAMANATHAN's event
yesterday
Dr. U. PRAMANATHAN and Naveen Dobriyal are now friends
yesterday
Dr. U. PRAMANATHAN posted an event
yesterday
Paojathang Haokip posted a status
"Thank you LIS Links for accepting me as a member."
yesterday
Naveen Dobriyal updated their profile
yesterday
Nuria Bautista posted a discussion
yesterday
Profile IconRachnaye, Ramesh Kumar, Jayashree Konwar and 91 more joined LIS Links
yesterday
Dr. U. PRAMANATHAN posted blog posts
yesterday
Laxman Prasad updated their profile
Wednesday
Dr. U. PRAMANATHAN posted a discussion
Wednesday
Dr. U. PRAMANATHAN posted blog posts
Tuesday
Alekha Karadia posted a blog post
Tuesday
Profile IconRAMAKANTA SAHU, Rajendra Dhiman, Dr H Nayana and 6 more joined LIS Links
Monday
Pradeep Kumar Singh posted a discussion
Monday
Rathod Pradip J. joined Dr. Badan Barman's group
Monday
Rathod Pradip J. joined Dr. Badan Barman's group
Monday

Rules Can’t be Introduced Just Before Exam Results: HC

DC | Shashiprasad S.M. | 04th Aug 2013

Bengaluru: The Karnataka High Court has held that regulations cannot be introduced at the fag end of an examination process or just before or at the time of announcement of results.

The court passed the order while quashing the category-wise qualifying criteria for eligibility for lecturers’ posts for the UGC NET last year.

Justice Ashok B. Hinchigeri passed the order recently, while allowing two petitions challenging action by the University Grants Commiss­ion, which had changed the eligibility criteria for general category candidates at the time of announcing the results for exams held in June 2012.

A 36-year-old lecturer and an advocate, postgraduates in law from Mysore University, had appeared for the National Eligibility Test (NET) for the junior research fellowship and lecturer posts.

The eligibility criteria for the post of lectureship for the candidates from general category was initially set at 40% in paper-I, 40% in paper-II and 50% in paper-III. As per the notification issued by the UGC NET Bureau, both the petitioners had obtained the minimum qualifying percentage in all the three papers.

But the NET Bureau, at the time of announcing the results, raised the minimum qualifying percentage to aggregate 65 for the candidates from general category, prompting the two petitioners to approach the court.

The counsel for the petitioners submitted that the terms and conditions at the time of calling for the applications govern the entire process of the test, including the fixing of the minimum marks and the announcement of results.

 “Midway, the minimum qualifying percentage cannot be varied to the disadvantage of the candidates,” the advocate argued, placing before the court an order of the Kerala High Court quashing the upward revision of minimum qualifying percentage.

The court ordered: “The aggregate 65 as minimum qualifying percentage is quashed. It is declared that the petitioners have acquired the eligibility criteria for lectureship, if they have indeed secured 40 per cent in paper – I, 40 per cent in paper – II and 50 per cent in paper – III or more.” The court also directed the UGC to issue the eligibility certificate to the petitioners before August 16. 

Views: 434

Reply to This

Replies to This Forum

what happens next, will the UGC give the certificate or we need to wait for a another year or so... while Supreme Court gives its verdict. 

Congratulations!!!!!!!!!!

RSS

© 2025   Created by Dr. Badan Barman.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service

Koha Workshop