Permissible loss in library - LIS Links2024-03-28T13:35:04Zhttp://lislinks.com/forum/topics/permissible-loss-in-library?commentId=2013205%3AComment%3A933634&feed=yes&xn_auth=nototal library collection 1200…tag:lislinks.com,2018-02-24:2013205:Comment:9346882018-02-24T06:31:31.071ZRETHI Mhttp://lislinks.com/profile/RETHIM
<p>total library collection 12000 books. how many books are allowed to loss per year.i think 36 books are allowed as per rule is it true?</p>
<p>total library collection 12000 books. how many books are allowed to loss per year.i think 36 books are allowed as per rule is it true?</p> The why the the used the word…tag:lislinks.com,2018-02-19:2013205:Comment:9340802018-02-19T09:02:19.096Zpriyanka vasudevahttp://lislinks.com/profile/priyankavasudeva
<p>The why the the used the word "circulated/consulted", they could have simply said "3 books per 1000 books""</p>
<p>The why the the used the word "circulated/consulted", they could have simply said "3 books per 1000 books""</p> Sir, what are the appropriate…tag:lislinks.com,2018-02-18:2013205:Comment:9338512018-02-18T04:21:51.376ZSagar Sherpahttp://lislinks.com/profile/SagarSherpa
<p><span>Sir, what are the appropriate action?</span></p>
<p><span>Sir, what are the appropriate action?</span></p> Thanks Sri Vijendra Kumar for…tag:lislinks.com,2018-02-15:2013205:Comment:9336522018-02-15T07:50:17.918ZSiddhartha Shankar Rayhttp://lislinks.com/profile/SiddharthaShankarRay
<p>Thanks Sri Vijendra Kumar for following my point correctly.</p>
<p></p>
<p>Regards,</p>
<p></p>
<p>Siddhartha S. Ray, Calcutta</p>
<p></p>
<p>Thanks Sri Vijendra Kumar for following my point correctly.</p>
<p></p>
<p>Regards,</p>
<p></p>
<p>Siddhartha S. Ray, Calcutta</p>
<p></p> Dear Sri Kumar Sanjay,
Thanks…tag:lislinks.com,2018-02-15:2013205:Comment:9334882018-02-15T07:49:03.783ZSiddhartha Shankar Rayhttp://lislinks.com/profile/SiddharthaShankarRay
<p>Dear Sri Kumar Sanjay,</p>
<p>Thanks for your post. Before replying, let me take the liberty to convey my deep appreciation to Sri Virendra Kumar Saab for understanding my points clearly.</p>
<p>Now coming to the context, I have mentioned that "... It is the Collection that counts not Circulation/consultation" to further explain the issue I mentioned that if those 1000 books are circulated/consulted 50,000 times (which is equal to 1000X50), and if 3/1000 is waived on the basis of…</p>
<p>Dear Sri Kumar Sanjay,</p>
<p>Thanks for your post. Before replying, let me take the liberty to convey my deep appreciation to Sri Virendra Kumar Saab for understanding my points clearly.</p>
<p>Now coming to the context, I have mentioned that "... It is the Collection that counts not Circulation/consultation" to further explain the issue I mentioned that if those 1000 books are circulated/consulted 50,000 times (which is equal to 1000X50), and if 3/1000 is waived on the basis of circulation/consultation (as Ms. Priyanka Vasudeva intimated about 5000 circulation of 1000 book) then for 1000X50 @ 3/1000 3X50 =150 books should be waived as per her her argument which is not the rule. it is irrespective of the circulation/consultation and on the basis of the collection strength only.</p>
<p></p>
<p>I hope I could clear your confusion.</p>
<p></p>
<p>Sincerely,</p>
<p></p>
<p>Siddhartha S. Ray, Calcutta</p>
<p></p> Siddhartha sir has calculate…tag:lislinks.com,2018-02-15:2013205:Comment:9336342018-02-15T06:04:04.076ZVijender Kumarhttp://lislinks.com/profile/vijenderkumar
<p>Siddhartha sir has calculated with the loss of 3 books per 1000 consulted books.i.e. 50X3=150</p>
<p></p>
<p>Siddhartha sir has calculated with the loss of 3 books per 1000 consulted books.i.e. 50X3=150</p>
<p></p> As per the GFR 2017, Rule No.…tag:lislinks.com,2018-02-15:2013205:Comment:9333242018-02-15T06:01:09.925ZNiraj Kumarhttp://lislinks.com/profile/NirajKumar662
<p>As per the <strong>GFR 2017, Rule No. - 215 (ii)</strong> Loss of five volumes per one thousand volumes of books issued/consulted in a year may be taken as reasonable provided such losses are not attributable to dishonesty or negligence. However, loss of a book of a value exceeding Rs. 1,000/- (Rupees One thousand only) and rare books irrespective of value shall invariably be investigated and appropriate action taken. </p>
<p>As per the <strong>GFR 2017, Rule No. - 215 (ii)</strong> Loss of five volumes per one thousand volumes of books issued/consulted in a year may be taken as reasonable provided such losses are not attributable to dishonesty or negligence. However, loss of a book of a value exceeding Rs. 1,000/- (Rupees One thousand only) and rare books irrespective of value shall invariably be investigated and appropriate action taken. </p> 150 loss should be accommodat…tag:lislinks.com,2018-02-15:2013205:Comment:9336282018-02-15T05:53:08.533Zk̶u̶m̶a̶r ѕαηנαуhttp://lislinks.com/profile/snjkumar927
<p><span><strong>150 l</strong>oss should be accommodated!! Expain sir how did u find 150??</span></p>
<p></p>
<p><span><strong>150 l</strong>oss should be accommodated!! Expain sir how did u find 150??</span></p>
<p></p> Dear Ms.Priyanka Basudeva,
Th…tag:lislinks.com,2018-02-14:2013205:Comment:9334122018-02-14T12:27:38.395ZSiddhartha Shankar Rayhttp://lislinks.com/profile/SiddharthaShankarRay
<p>Dear Ms.Priyanka Basudeva,</p>
<p>The counting will be based on 1000 books. It is the collection that counts not the circulation/consultation. Otherwise if those 1000 books are circulated/consulted 50, 000 times altogether, then according to the formula, 150 loss should be accommodated!! Never-the-less, there is another clause in the GOI rule that such loss should not be because of negligence from the part of Library staff!.</p>
<p></p>
<p>Hope I could explain the issue for your…</p>
<p>Dear Ms.Priyanka Basudeva,</p>
<p>The counting will be based on 1000 books. It is the collection that counts not the circulation/consultation. Otherwise if those 1000 books are circulated/consulted 50, 000 times altogether, then according to the formula, 150 loss should be accommodated!! Never-the-less, there is another clause in the GOI rule that such loss should not be because of negligence from the part of Library staff!.</p>
<p></p>
<p>Hope I could explain the issue for your understanding..</p>
<p></p>
<p>Sincerely,</p>
<p></p>
<p>Siddhartha S. Ray, Calcutta</p> Ok but what if library has to…tag:lislinks.com,2018-02-14:2013205:Comment:9333022018-02-14T07:44:02.187Zpriyanka vasudevahttp://lislinks.com/profile/priyankavasudeva
<p>Ok but what if library has total 1000 books only but they are issued 5000 times in a year</p>
<p>Ok but what if library has total 1000 books only but they are issued 5000 times in a year</p>