LIS Links

First and Largest Academic Social Network of LIS Professionals in India

Latest Activity

Profile IconRachnaye, Ramesh Kumar, Jayashree Konwar and 91 more joined LIS Links
35 minutes ago
Dr. U. PRAMANATHAN posted blog posts
2 hours ago
Laxman Prasad updated their profile
20 hours ago
Dr. U. PRAMANATHAN posted an event

Final Call for Papers: CALIBER-2025. at Sri Venkateswara University, Tirupati, Andhra Pradesh

November 17, 2025 at 9am to November 19, 2025 at 5pm
21 hours ago
Dr. U. PRAMANATHAN posted a discussion
21 hours ago
Dr. U. PRAMANATHAN posted blog posts
yesterday
Alekha Karadia posted a blog post
Tuesday
Profile IconRAMAKANTA SAHU, Rajendra Dhiman, Dr H Nayana and 6 more joined LIS Links
Monday
Pradeep Kumar Singh posted a discussion
Monday
Rathod Pradip J. joined Dr. Badan Barman's group
Monday
Rathod Pradip J. joined Dr. Badan Barman's group
Monday
Dr. Anil Kumar Jharotia left a comment for Bibhuti Nath Jha
Monday
Dr. Anil Kumar Jharotia left a comment for ANEETA SAXENA
Monday
Dr. Anil Kumar Jharotia updated their profile
Monday
Dr. Anil Kumar Jharotia is now friends with T VINAY GOUTHAM, santosh kumar srivastava, kashif and 7
Monday
Dr. Anil Kumar Jharotia replied to Dr. Anil Kumar Jharotia's discussion BEST PRACTICING LIBRARIAN AWARD
Monday
Sanjay Kumar Gola and M.MANI are now friends
Saturday
Misal Pravin Raya updated their profile
Saturday
Pravin Misal updated their profile
Saturday
ALOK KUMAR is attending Sourav Debnath's event
Thumbnail

Online National workshop on Library Management using Open Source Software at Dhanbad

June 16, 2025 at 10am to June 20, 2025 at 5pm
Jun 12

Opinion against minium marks for different category

I have a serious objection towards the cut off mark essential for the General category of students who write the UGC exam. To decide a candidate if he has passed or failed in the UGC exam the differentiation in the marks is not acceptable. The eligibility to write UGC has a differentiation in marks which I do not object. But to decide if I have passed or failed in UGC has been declared with different marks for different category, which is very undigestable.Kindly consider and make an equal assessment for all categories. This is my personal opinion which i consider is essential for the future development of our country's education system.

Views: 1632

Reply to This

Replies to This Forum

I too agreed with you Sir

I also belongs to OBC Category.I Have 61% in NET Exam, But I Filled my Form in Gen Category...Why? I Dont want to Hurt any Community, But I am Totaly Disagree with UGC Criteria for Qualifying UGC/NET Exam at different lavels. This system is Totaly wrong. I Want to say Much More on This Topic but there is No Use to Reading a book to a Buffalo. I Just Want to say that in India There are so many programmes started to get a tallent, like (DID, Sa Re Ga Ma Pa, Indian Idol, Sur Kshetra, and so on , Why they can't take desicion category wise, why they are in search of a talented singer or dancer. “Biology gives you a brain. Life turns it into a mind.” " God Gives us same Mind ,No Mind is Poor by Birth nor different by Race , Religion, Sex or Age"The purpose of education is to replace an empty mind with an open one.

You are right Ashok, there is no use in blowing BANSUREE here.

Today's  World's Greatest Personalities are on Peak Due to There Talent not due to their Religion, Race and Sex. 

Yes, apart from eligibility (PG percentage) criteria for appearing the NET exam, WE ALSO DO NOT MIND THE DIFFERENCE OF FEES for prospectus and NET registration. But disparity in qualifying NET percentage, is really regrettable.
Just an anology: you give discounts for appearing 100 mts race, but general candidate has to run 100 mts and others less than 100 mts is really demotivating.

RSS

© 2025   Created by Dr. Badan Barman.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service

Koha Workshop