LIS Links

First and Largest Academic Social Network of LIS Professionals in India

Latest Activity

LAITHANGBAM NEPOLEAN SINGH shared Ravithimmegowda's discussion on Facebook
20 hours ago
LAITHANGBAM NEPOLEAN SINGH updated their profile
20 hours ago
Dr. O Seshaiaih and Sumit Sundar Ray are now friends
21 hours ago
Sumit Sundar Ray updated their profile
yesterday
Bristy Handique updated their profile
Saturday
meghabat singh updated their profile
Saturday
Elukoti Bhosle updated their profile
Saturday
DEVI SHANKAR DINGARA updated their profile
Friday
ASHUTOSH KAG updated their profile
Thursday
Dr. U. PRAMANATHAN posted discussions
Thursday
Dr. U. PRAMANATHAN posted blog posts
Thursday
Dr. U. PRAMANATHAN is now friends with Ramesh Kumar and Suraj Morya
Thursday
Archanagita Saikia posted a discussion
Thursday
Manju Meerwal joined Dr. Badan Barman's group
Thursday
Dr. O Seshaiaih posted a discussion
Thursday
Dr. A. Madhava Rao posted an event

Online-Lecture on "AI Tools for Academic Research Writing and Publishing" at Microsoft Teams (Online)

August 4, 2025 from 2pm to 4pm
Thursday
Dr. Badan Barman posted a blog post
Thursday
MANJEET KHATRI posted a blog post
Thursday
Profile IconRadhika J, Mohan, RP Raaj and 36 more joined LIS Links
Thursday
MANJEET KHATRI updated their profile
Wednesday

KVS Decleared Result for Librarian - 2018

Facebook

Views: 13579

Reply to This

Replies to This Forum

Sir.

What was you score accoding to ans key.?

Pl.tell us.

145 and yours

KVS has adopted normalization method to prepare result. Hence, candidates may find their marks higher than cut-off still not selected.

I got 132 please explain why I am not shortlisted 

To understand normalization see this video.

https://youtu.be/4hMbq7aBLpI

May be I think objections were raised and you lost 2 marks in the objections and hence your total became  130. Its very clever of KVS that they displayed the result but we can not login into any portal and actually see our marks. Certainly to avoid any chaos may be arising out of doubts of candidates with low marks or non-selection in the result.

Hahaha but about objectionable question 1969 right one kvs given wrong answer their are 4 to 5 objectionable question I mark the right answer 

This is what I said. This is clever part of KVS to not to make any login portal and let candidates check marks online but to simply upload a PDF with selected candidates.

Ir plz how to see my marks in kvs result plz tell

 me 

anyone can explain how it is possible to the cutoff in decimal like 130.964 if minus marking is not applicable to the exam...

3 questions are deleted and result is prepared out 0f 197.   

FormulA IS A CANDIDATE GOT 129 MARKS IN WRITTEN .AFTER NORMALIZATION HIS MARKS WILL BECOME.     129/197*200=130.964

Dear All,

1.  After evaluating the entire list, what surprise me that KVS has not follow the reservation rule properly, as I personally known to few candidates who have scored more than 135 marks still they are in OBC list instead UR list. How come it is ?

2. As per the post is TGT librarian, should they not follow thier own ratio of calling candidate for interview ?

(As they have called candidate three times  ratio in North East TGT and PGT vacancy which was published in last month).

RSS

© 2025   Created by Dr. Badan Barman.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service

Koha Workshop