LIS Links

First and Largest Academic Social Network of LIS Professionals in India

Latest Activity

Archanagita Saikia updated their profile
yesterday
RP Raaj shared a profile on Facebook
Friday
prema updated their profile
Friday
Vikram Jain replied to Vikram Jain's discussion Call for Chapter Contribution in Editorial Book "Artificial Intelligence Connect: Empowering Education & Enabling Libraries"
Thursday
Abdullah al-Modabber updated their profile
Wednesday
Fazal posted a status
"🎓 Decode DDC with AI: Smart Classification 🗓️ Date: 31st August 2025 ⏰ Time: 06:30 – 08:PM Register: https://forms.gle/uuNBECwesduV2fjd6"
Wednesday
YOGESHKUMAR HARILAL LAD is attending komal patel's event
Thumbnail

National Conference on Re-Imagining Libraries of Viksit Bharat 29-30 AUGUST 2025 at Bhopal

August 29, 2025 at 10am to August 30, 2025 at 5pm
Wednesday
LAITHANGBAM NEPOLEAN SINGH shared Ravithimmegowda's discussion on Facebook
Jul 20
LAITHANGBAM NEPOLEAN SINGH updated their profile
Jul 20
Dr. O Seshaiaih and Sumit Sundar Ray are now friends
Jul 20
Sumit Sundar Ray updated their profile
Jul 20
Bristy Handique updated their profile
Jul 19
meghabat singh updated their profile
Jul 18
Elukoti Bhosle updated their profile
Jul 18
DEVI SHANKAR DINGARA updated their profile
Jul 17
ASHUTOSH KAG updated their profile
Jul 17
Dr. U. PRAMANATHAN posted discussions
Jul 16
Dr. U. PRAMANATHAN posted blog posts
Jul 16
Dr. U. PRAMANATHAN is now friends with Ramesh Kumar and Suraj Morya
Jul 16
Archanagita Saikia posted a discussion
Jul 16

Is There Any Grammatical Mistake in Dr. Ranganatha's Five Law of Library Science

Many Lecturer says that there are grammatical mistake in the 2nd & 3rd Law of Library Science..

Every Reader his/her Book

Every Book It's Reader

The above statement doesn't make any sense. Please guide me, Is this really so and How Dr. Ranganathan can do such mistake

Facebook

Views: 758

Reply to This

Replies to This Forum

Dear Atul

If you or your lecturers feel there is a grammatical mistake in the above laws enunciated by Dr. SRR then what according to you or your lecturers should be the right version?

If we know that then we will be able to debate freely on the issue.

I feel the laws stated above are right.  Superfluous words have been eliminated and law of parsimony,I guess, has been applied.

Thanku so much for your Reply...

Lecturer says that

3rd & 4th law should be

Every Reader has his /her Book

Every book has its Reader.

I toldthem that it is law and law should be free of grammar and unwanted word

Dear sir,

Dr. Rangnathan is considered to be the father of library science, documentation, and information science in India. So we should understand that father can't make mistakes, instead children sometimes misinterpret the father.

One can say there are grammatical mistakes, If you write these laws without commas,

          2nd law:-   "Every reader his [or her] book."

          3rd law:-    "Every book its reader."

You may find it perfectly fine if they are written with commas;

          2nd law:-  "Every reader ,  his [or her] book."

          3rd law:-   "Every book ,  its reader."

There is no need to use any prepositions or verbs in this laws for grammatical corrections. It is worth to understand the meaning of these laws instead of criticizing Dr. Rangnathan.

Regards

RSS

© 2025   Created by Dr. Badan Barman.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service

Koha Workshop