LIS Links

First and Largest Academic Social Network of LIS Professionals in India

Latest Activity

shashi bisht and Dr. Badan Barman are now friends
6 hours ago
UMARKHAIYAM DULEMIYA MULANI updated their profile
17 hours ago
Abid Hussain replied to Amarjit Kumar Singh's discussion CALL FOR CHAPTER IN AN EDITED BOOK ENTITLED, “Innovative Library Services, Implementation of ICT, and the Incorporation of Artificial Intelligence Tools”
yesterday
Nishita Goswami updated their profile
yesterday
Angel updated their profile
yesterday
Profile IconThanga Tamilarasi, Dr Vijaykumar B Gopale, UMARKHAIYAM DULEMIYA MULANI and 16 more joined LIS Links
yesterday
preeti verma is now friends with amit sana and mandhata pratap singh
Monday
MD SAFIQUR RAHAMAN and sandeep shukla are now friends
Saturday
RAKESH KUMAR updated their profile
Oct 30
mukesh left a comment for Dr Nupur Srivastava
Oct 29
mukesh left a comment for Dr Nupur Srivastava
Oct 29
Shakeel Ahmad Mir updated their profile
Oct 27
Dr. U. PRAMANATHAN posted a blog post
Oct 26
Dr. U. PRAMANATHAN posted an event
Oct 23
Dr. U. PRAMANATHAN is now friends with Sumit Sundar Ray and HINGE RAMAKANTH
Oct 23
Dr. Sheel Bhadra Yadav posted an event

Request to Participate in Research Study on AI Adoption in LIS at India

October 19, 2025 at 6pm to November 30, 2025 at 7pm
Oct 23
Dr. O Seshaiaih posted a discussion
Oct 23
Dr. N K Pachauri posted a discussion
Oct 23
Dr. U. PRAMANATHAN posted a discussion
Oct 23
Dr.Stephen.G updated their profile
Oct 21

Is There Any Grammatical Mistake in Dr. Ranganatha's Five Law of Library Science

Many Lecturer says that there are grammatical mistake in the 2nd & 3rd Law of Library Science..

Every Reader his/her Book

Every Book It's Reader

The above statement doesn't make any sense. Please guide me, Is this really so and How Dr. Ranganathan can do such mistake

Views: 784

Reply to This

Replies to This Forum

Dear Atul

If you or your lecturers feel there is a grammatical mistake in the above laws enunciated by Dr. SRR then what according to you or your lecturers should be the right version?

If we know that then we will be able to debate freely on the issue.

I feel the laws stated above are right.  Superfluous words have been eliminated and law of parsimony,I guess, has been applied.

Thanku so much for your Reply...

Lecturer says that

3rd & 4th law should be

Every Reader has his /her Book

Every book has its Reader.

I toldthem that it is law and law should be free of grammar and unwanted word

Dear sir,

Dr. Rangnathan is considered to be the father of library science, documentation, and information science in India. So we should understand that father can't make mistakes, instead children sometimes misinterpret the father.

One can say there are grammatical mistakes, If you write these laws without commas,

          2nd law:-   "Every reader his [or her] book."

          3rd law:-    "Every book its reader."

You may find it perfectly fine if they are written with commas;

          2nd law:-  "Every reader ,  his [or her] book."

          3rd law:-   "Every book ,  its reader."

There is no need to use any prepositions or verbs in this laws for grammatical corrections. It is worth to understand the meaning of these laws instead of criticizing Dr. Rangnathan.

Regards

RSS

© 2025   Created by Dr. Badan Barman.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service

Koha Workshop